Before discussing supersymmetry, we must discuss the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SM), which describes all the elementary particles in nature, and the forces between them.
One of the most important ways of classifying the particles is by
their spin (that is, their internal angular momentum quantum number). The
spins of particles are quantized in multiples of half of Planck's constant
. Particles whose spins are half-integer multiples of Planck's
constant have very different behavior from those whose spins are integer
multiples of
. The former are called fermions, and they make up all
the matter that we see around us; the latter are called bosons, and they act
as the carriers of the forces by which particles of matter interact with
each other1. The next two
sections describe these particles.
Fermilab has a web site where you can learn more about the science of particle physics. The Particle Data Group also has a page (most of it is aimed towards poets, but the ``Beyond the Standard Model'' section is very good). The masses and other properties of all these particles can be found in the Particle Data Book.
Table 1 lists the fermions--the particles that make up
matter in the world around us. All these particles have spins of
.
We can make the following observations about the fermions:
Table 2 lists the bosons--the particles that propagate forces.
The spins are all integer multiples of
.
A number of interesting points about the bosons:
To the best of our knowledge, the Standard Model agrees well with experimental data; however, high energy physicists are still unhappy with it since it is so ad hoc. For example, there are several dozen different parameters that describe the model, all of which cannot be predicted a priori, but must be measured. (Think of them as a few dozen different knobs that could be turned--each setting of the knobs gives you a completely different universe.) These parameters include the masses of the particles and the coupling strengths of the forces.
For many years, theorists have been working on trying to unify the forces; that is, to show that all four forces of nature can be derived from a single force (put another way, there could be a single force in nature, and the forces that we see are low-energy approximations to this single unified force). A major step towards unification occurred in the late '60's when Glashow, Weinberg and Salam showed that the electromagnetic force and the weak force are just two facets of the electroweak force.
In the process of unifying these two forces, a new boson called the Higgs
boson (
) had to be introduced. Among other things, this boson gives
masses to all the particles. This particle is the only one in the Standard
Model that hasn't yet been observed experimentally (the theoretical
situation isn't completely clear, either--you will see below that
supersymmetry requires more than one Higgs boson).
The successful unification of the electromagnetic and weak forces has given particle physicists hope that all the other forces, including gravity, may be unified. Superstrings are a popular candidate these days, and supersymmetry is a natural consequence of many superstring theories.
There is another reason why supersymmetry is popular these days. We know
that the coupling strengths of the forces change with energy; for example,
the strength of the electromagnetic force at ordinary energies is
; but at the energies of LEP or SLC (90 GeV) the
strength increases to
. If the forces
really are unified at some high energy scale, then we would expect the
electromagnetic, weak and strong forces to have the same strength at this
unification scale. However, the top part of Figure 1
shows that the Standard Model coupling strengths extrapolated to very high
energies do not converge at a single point. However, the introduction of
supersymmetry (bottom plot) causes the coupling strengths to converge at a
single point.
|